|
|
|
This article may be reprinted free of charge provided 1) that there is clear attribution to the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, and 2) that both the OMNS free subscription link http://orthomolecular.org/subscribe.html and also the OMNS archive link http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/index.shtml are included.
Why Cell Therapy Outcomes Vary: The Role of Host System Biologyby Richard Z. Cheng, MD, PhD
Editor's Note:This article is the first in a three-part series exploring a central question in regenerative medicine: Why do patients receiving the same cell-based therapy often experience markedly different outcomes? This series examines that question through a systems-level lens, focusing on the role of host biology, regulatory networks, and clinical context in shaping therapeutic response. Subsequent articles will explore the underlying mechanisms-particularly the Insulin-Cortisol-Vitamin C (ICV) axis-and outline a practical framework for system-level optimization to improve clinical outcomes. IntroductionCell-based therapies-particularly stem cell interventions-are among the most promising frontiers in modern medicine. From metabolic diseases to reproductive disorders, they offer the potential not only to manage disease, but to restore function. Yet in real-world clinical practice, one observation consistently emerges: Outcomes vary significantly between patients. Patients receiving similar cell products under comparable protocols often experience markedly different results. Some show meaningful improvement, while others achieve only modest benefit or none at all. Clinical studies in both metabolic and reproductive medicine have reported heterogeneous outcomes following cell-based interventions, even under controlled conditions [1-5]. These observations suggest that factors beyond cell quality and delivery technique are at play. A Missing Variable: The Host SystemAcross conditions such as Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), a consistent pattern emerges: cells do not function in isolation. The same intervention may produce different outcomes in different biological environments. This points to a critical-and likely dominant-determinant: the host system into which the therapy is introduced [6]. Cells do not function in isolation; their survival, integration, and activity are governed by the metabolic, endocrine, and biochemical state of the host. From Cell-Centric to System-Centric ThinkingModern regenerative medicine is largely cell-centric, focusing on:
Implicit in this model is the assumption that the host environment is sufficiently supportive. However, chronic diseases are frequently characterized by:
These factors define the terrain in which therapeutic cells must operate [7-10]. A key question, then, is how to conceptualize and measure this 'host system' in a clinically meaningful way. The ICV Axis: A Regulatory FrameworkA systems-level perspective can be conceptualized through the Insulin-Cortisol-Vitamin C (ICV) axis [11], integrating metabolic, endocrine, and redox regulation [6, 12].
Vitamin C is particularly relevant in orthomolecular medicine. It is highly concentrated in endocrine tissues, including the adrenal glands and ovaries, where it supports hormone synthesis and protects against oxidative stress. In conditions of chronic disease, physiological demand for vitamin C may increase substantially, potentially leading to functional depletion. Disturbances across this axis may result in a biological state that is:
Implications for Regenerative TherapiesThe success of cell-based therapies depends on several system-dependent processes:
In compromised systems, studies suggest that:
Two Diseases, One PrincipleThis systems-dependent variability can be observed across distinct clinical domains. In Type 2 Diabetes:
create a metabolically unfavorable environment for beta-cell recovery and regeneration [6, 16]. In Premature Ovarian Insufficiency:
may limit the responsiveness of ovarian tissue to regenerative interventions. Despite different clinical manifestations, both conditions reflect underlying disturbances in systemic regulation. Reframing Regenerative MedicineIf therapeutic outcomes are influenced by system state, then regenerative medicine may benefit from a broader clinical model: from "cell therapy" to "system-conditioned therapy [6]." This approach may include: Before intervention:
After intervention:
A Shift in Clinical ThinkingThis perspective does not diminish the value of cell-based therapies. Rather, it provides a framework to better understand and potentially improve their outcomes. Cell therapy introduces potential.
ConclusionVariability in regenerative medicine outcomes is unlikely to be explained solely by technical factors [15, 17]. A systems perspective suggests that the host environment plays a central, and potentially modifiable, role. Integrating metabolic, endocrine, and orthomolecular optimization into clinical protocols may help improve consistency and durability of outcomes. The future of regenerative medicine may therefore depend not only on advancing cellular technologies, but on developing strategies to prepare-and maintain-the biological systems in which these therapies are applied. About the AuthorRichard Z. Cheng, MD, PhD, is Editor-in-Chief of the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service and a physician-scientist specializing in integrative and orthomolecular approaches to chronic disease. His work focuses on systems-level frameworks for metabolic, inflammatory, and degenerative conditions. He provides international consultations for complex cases requiring a systems-based approach. Additional writings are available at his Substack. References (Selected)1. Zarei, M. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Future Directions. Mol Biol Rep 2025, 52, (1), 1046. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-025-11133-7. 2. Manikandan, S.; Hariprasad, R.; Bagepally, B.S. Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Syst Rev 2026, 15, (1), 75. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-025-03054-0. 3. Waris, S.; Begam, H.H.; Kumar, M.P.; et al. Stem Cell-Derived Beta-Cell Therapies: Encapsulation Advances and Immunological Hurdles in Diabetes Treatment. Cells 2026, 15, (2), 191. DOI: 10.3390/cells15020191. 4. Lin, T.-M.; Lin, T.-C.; Lin, C.-H.; et al. Overview of the Major Clinical Trials Investigating Stem Cells-Based Therapies for Diabetes. Diabetes & Metabolism 2026, 52, (2), 101738. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2026.101738; Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1262363626000170. 5. Schwarz, K.A.; Leonard, J.N. Engineering Cell-Based Therapies to Interface Robustly with Host Physiology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2016, 105, (Pt A), 55-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.019. 6. Martins, A. Unifying Pharmacology, Systems Biology, and Regenerative Medicine to Advance Personalized Therapies. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 16. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1729610; Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1729610/full. 7. Lepp, H.-L.; Amrein, K.; Dizdar, O.S.; et al. LLL 44 - Module 3: Micronutrients in Chronic Disease. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN 2024, 62, 285-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.05.009; Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457724001281. 8. Qin, Y.; Qian, C.; Li, W.; et al. Oxidative Stress: Molecular Mechanisms, Diseases, and Therapeutic Targets. MedComm (2020) 2026, 7, (2), e70600. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70600. 9. Grant, W.B.; Wimalawansa, S.J.; Pludowski, P.; et al. Vitamin D: Evidence-Based Health Benefits and Recommendations for Population Guidelines. Nutrients 2025, 17, (2), 277. DOI: 10.3390/nu17020277. 10. Młynarska, E.; Lisińska, W.; Hossa, K.; et al. Vitamin D and Chronic Disorders: A Review of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, (10), 1467. DOI: 10.3390/ph18101467; Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/18/10/1467. 11. Cheng, R.Z.; Levy, T.E.; Hunninghake, R. The Insulin-Cortisol-Vitamin C Axis: A Missing Regulatory Framework in Metabolic and Hormonal Homeostasis A Narrative Review. 2025. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202512.0217.v1; Available online: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202512.0217. 12. Pianko, M.J.; Golob, J.L. Host-Microbe Interactions and Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2022, 41, (2), 367-382. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-022-10033-7. 13. Terashvili, M.; Bosnjak, Z.J. Stem Cell Therapies in Cardiovascular Disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019, 33, (1), 209-222. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.04.048. 14. Gibson, D.; Leonforte, C.; Madrigal, A. Strategies for Dealing with Donor Variability. Cell and Gene Therapy Insights 2018. DOI: 10.18609/cgti.2018.087; Available online: https://www.insights.bio/cell-and-gene-therapy-insights/journal/article/278/strategies-for-dealing-with-donor-variability. 15. Petrus-Reurer, S.; Romano, M.; Howlett, S.; et al. Immunological Considerations and Challenges for Regenerative Cellular Therapies. Commun Biol 2021, 4, (1), 798. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02237-4; Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-021-02237-4. 16. Ahn, B. Advances in Insulin Resistance-Molecular Mechanisms, Therapeutic Targets, and Future Directions. Int J Mol Sci 2025, 26, (6), 2574. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26062574. 17. National Academies of Sciences, E.; Division, H. and M.; Policy, B. on H.S.; et al. Factors Contributing to Patient Variability. In Exploring Sources of Variability Related to the Clinical Translation of Regenerative Engineering Products: Proceedings of a Workshop, National Academies Press (US), 2019.; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544024/. Orthomolecular MedicineOrthomolecular medicine uses safe, effective nutritional therapy to fight illness. For more information: http://www.orthomolecular.org Find a DoctorTo locate an orthomolecular physician near you: http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v06n09.shtml The peer-reviewed Orthomolecular Medicine News Service is a non-profit and non-commercial informational resource. Editorial Review Board:
Jennifer L. Aliano, M.S., L.Ac., C.C.N. (USA)
Comments and media contact: editor@orthomolecular.org OMNS welcomes but is unable to respond to individual reader emails. Reader comments become the property of OMNS and may or may not be used for publication. To Subscribe at no charge: https://www.orthomolecular.org/subscribe.html To Unsubscribe from this list: https://www.orthomolecular.org/unsubscribe.html |
This website is managed by Riordan Clinic
A Non-profit 501(c)(3) Medical, Research and Educational Organization
3100 North Hillside Avenue, Wichita, KS 67219 USA
Phone: 316-682-3100; Fax: 316-682-5054
© (Riordan Clinic) 2004 - 2024c
Information on Orthomolecular.org is provided for educational purposes only. It is not intended as medical advice.
Consult your orthomolecular health care professional for individual guidance on specific health problems.