![]() |
![]() |
This article may be reprinted free of charge provided 1) that there is clear attribution to the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, and 2) that both the OMNS free subscription link http://orthomolecular.org/subscribe.html and also the OMNS archive link http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/index.shtml are included. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Our Paper Went Viral in Nutritional Science
Academic and Public Impact Behind a Nutrients Top PaperBy Richard Z. Cheng, M.D., Ph.D., Bill Grant, Ph.D., Sunil Wimalawansa, M.D., Ph.D., Pawel Pludowski, Ph.D., and Barbara Boucher, M.D. ๐ An Unusual MilestonePublished in January 2025, our recent paper(1), shown below (Figure 1), in Nutrients has already achieved 36,490 views and over 3,482 downloads in just eight months - far above the journal's average. By academic standards, this qualifies as "viral." Figure 1. Publication details of the Nutrients paper: "Vitamin D: Evidence-Based Health Benefits and Recommendations for Population Guidelines" (January 2025). Since then, we have expanded the discussion regarding cardiovascular disease in a second paper(2). This is especially timely, since Mendelian Randomization is now considered a form of observational study - showing that our earlier approach was aligned with the evolving scientific consensus. This achievement reflects not only strong attention from the scientific community, but also broad cross-disciplinary and public engagement. More importantly, it lays a foundation for the global recognition of Integrative Orthomolecular Medicine (IOM). Introduction: Context and ControversyIt was written as a response to the seriously flawed (and conflated) new Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for vitamin D(3), which disavowed the 2011 Guidelines by a committee led by Michael Holick(4). The new guidelines were based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The Endocrine Society Guidelines indicate that the only people needing vitamin D supplementation were those 1 to 18 years, pregnant women, those with high-risk prediabetes, and those 75 years or older. This paper overlooked the fact that RCTs are not the proper way to evaluate any micronutrient, and for other ages and health outcomes were not properly designed, conducted, or analyzed, whether by intention or otherwise. In our review, we took the point of view that observational studies should be considered the best available evidence in the absence of evidence from RCTs. We then determined the top ten causes of death in the US and examined the evidence from observational studies. We found reasonably strong evidence for eight of the ten causes of death. As for citations, here are the numbers. The Demay et al. paper has 310 Google Scholar citations and 201 SCOPUS citations. Our paper has the highest number of citations among the 310 papers that cited it: 41 Google Scholar and 31 SCOPUS citations. It is also the second-highest cited paper published in Nutrients in 2025. Holick's paper has 8,512 SCOPUS citations, including 604 in 2024, 381 in 2025, and 14,766 Google Scholar citations, including 991 in 2024 and 581 in 2025. (Google Scholar includes many sources for citations while SCOPUS is limited to journals recognized by Elsevier from more than 7,000 publishers.) Thus, the Demay et al. paper can be considered just another example of the application of the "Disinformation Playbook" to discredit vitamin D by Big Pharma(5). ๐ What the Numbers Mean1. Views (36,490)
Figure 2. MDPI official metrics graph showing article views, surpassing 36,000 by September 2025 2. Downloads (>3,482)
3. Standing Among Peers
4. Journal Prestige
5. Beyond Citations
Figure 3. MDPI citation alert showing recent citations of our Vitamin D paper, including systematic reviews and clinical analyses (September 2025). ๐ Why It Matters for IOMNumbers alone do not tell the whole story. The extraordinary attention this paper has received suggests something larger: a worldwide hunger for credible, evidence-based nutritional strategies. For decades, Integrative Orthomolecular Medicine (IOM) has emphasized nutrition, detoxification, and metabolic balance as root-cause approaches to health. These results show that the international community - researchers, clinicians, journalists, and the public - is ready to listen. โ SummaryIn only eight months, this article has reached over 36,000 views and 3,400 downloads - an outstanding level of engagement in academic publishing. More importantly, this "authoritative journal + viral readership" effect highlights growing recognition of IOM as a credible, global medical approach. The message is clear: nutrition-centered medicine is stepping into the spotlight. ๐ Explore full metrics here:
About the AuthorsRichard Z. Cheng, M.D., Ph.D. - Editor-in-Chief, Orthomolecular Medicine News Service; Integrative Oncology; Co-founder, Society of International Metabolic Oncology (SIMO) William B. Grant, Ph.D. - Director, SUNARC; Global Expert on Vitamin D and Population Health Sunil J. Wimalawansa, M.D., Ph.D., MBA, DSc - Professor of Medicine, Clinical Endocrinologist & Human Hutrition; Clinical Trialist; Global Health Policy Advisor, and former advisor to the World Health Organization and multiple other national health ministries Pawel Pludowski, Ph.D. - Professor of Pediatrics and Laboratory Medicine at the Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland; internationally recognized researcher on vitamin D metabolism, diagnostics, and clinical applications. Barbara J. Boucher, M.D. - Emeritus Professor of Metabolic Medicine at Queen Mary University of London; clinical researcher specializing in vitamin D, diabetes, and metabolic bone disease. References:1. Grant WB, Wimalawansa SJ, Pludowski P, Cheng RZ. Vitamin D: Evidence-Based Health Benefits and Recommendations for Population Guidelines. Nutrients. 2025 Jan;17(2):277. 2. Grant WB, Boucher BJ, Cheng RZ, Pludowski P, Wimalawansa SJ. Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Health: A Narrative Review of Risk Reduction Evidence. Nutrients. 2025 Jan;17(13):2102. 3. Demay MB, Pittas A, Bikle DD. Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2024 Sept 6]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38828931/ 4. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 July;96(7):1911-30. 5. Grant WB. Vitamin D acceptance delayed by Big Pharma following the Disinformation Playbook. Orthomolecular Medicine News Service [Internet]. 2018 Oct 1;14(22). Available from: https://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v14n22.shtml Orthomolecular MedicineOrthomolecular medicine uses safe, effective nutritional therapy to fight illness. For more information: http://www.orthomolecular.org Find a DoctorTo locate an orthomolecular physician near you: http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v06n09.shtml The peer-reviewed Orthomolecular Medicine News Service is a non-profit and non-commercial informational resource. Editorial Review Board:
Jennifer L. Aliano, M.S., L.Ac., C.C.N. (USA)
Comments and media contact: editor@orthomolecular.org OMNS welcomes but is unable to respond to individual reader emails. Reader comments become the property of OMNS and may or may not be used for publication. To Subscribe at no charge: http://www.orthomolecular.org/subscribe.html To Unsubscribe from this list: http://www.orthomolecular.org/unsubscribe.html |
This website is managed by Riordan Clinic
A Non-profit 501(c)(3) Medical, Research and Educational Organization
3100 North Hillside Avenue, Wichita, KS 67219 USA
Phone: 316-682-3100; Fax: 316-682-5054
© (Riordan Clinic) 2004 - 2024c
Information on Orthomolecular.org is provided for educational purposes only. It is not intended as medical advice.
Consult your orthomolecular health care professional for individual guidance on specific health problems.